How do activated carbon and coconut carbon filters work in water purification?

When choosing a home water filter, it's important to understand the differences between filter types. Activated carbon and coconut carbon are two popular water filtration materials, each with its own characteristics and benefits. The former is made from coal, wood, or other carbon-rich materials, while the latter is specifically crafted from coconut shells. These materials differ in pore structure, filtration capacity, and lifespan, which directly impacts their effectiveness in purifying drinking water.

The operation of both filter types is based on the principle of adsorption—a process in which contaminants adhere to the surface of the filter material. In activated carbon filters, a porous structure is created by heating materials such as coal or wood under oxygen-free conditions. This treatment creates a vast internal surface with millions of microscopic pores where contaminants can be trapped.

Coconut carbon filters are made specifically from coconut shells and undergo a similar activation process. The main difference lies in the pore structure: coconut carbon naturally contains more micropores (smaller than 2 nanometers), while traditional activated carbon often has larger mesopores (2-50 nanometers). These structural differences determine which substances are effectively filtered.

The smaller micropores in coconut carbon make this material particularly effective at removing smaller molecules such as certain organic compounds and chlorine. Traditional activated carbon, with its larger pores, is actually better at filtering larger molecules and particles.

Which contaminants do these filters remove best?

Both filter types are effective against certain contaminants, but differ in their specializations. Activated carbon filters excel at removing chlorine, chlorine taste and odor, and larger organic molecules. They are also reasonably effective against some pesticides, herbicides, and industrial solvents.

Coconut carbon filters, thanks to their finer pore structure, have an advantage in filtering smaller molecules. They are excellent at removing volatile organic compounds (VOCs), certain pesticides, and chlorine. Moreover, they often perform better in improving the taste and odor of water.

Both filter types offer limited protection against heavy metals like lead or mercury. A water filter system with reverse osmosis technology is more effective, such as our Source systems, which can remove up to 99% of unwanted substances.

Pollution Activated carbon Coconut carbon
Chlorine Good Excellent
Organic matter Good (larger molecules) Good (smaller molecules)
Pesticides Moderate to good Good
Taste and odor improvement Good Excellent

What is the lifespan and cost-effectiveness of both filter types?

The lifespan of water filters depends on several factors, including water quality, frequency of use, and filter size. Generally, coconut carbon filters have a longer lifespan than conventional activated carbon filters. This is due to the higher density and greater adsorption capacity of coconut shells.

In terms of cost-effectiveness, coconut carbon filters are generally a bit more expensive to purchase, but their longer lifespan can make them more cost-effective in the long run. A coconut carbon filter lasts an average of 20-30% longer than a comparable activated carbon filter.

From an environmental perspective, coconut-carbon filters have an advantage because they are made from a renewable resource. Coconut shells are a byproduct of coconut production, giving these filters a smaller carbon footprint than filters made from coal or other non-renewable resources.

At PureAqua, we offer high-quality water filter systems with carefully selected filter materials for optimal water purification. For best results, we recommend replacing filters annually, regardless of type, to ensure consistently high water quality.

For the most effective water purification, we recommend choosing a complete system such as our reverse osmosis water filter systems, which combine carbon filtration and other purification techniques for the very best results.

Latest blogs

View all

Quooker vs Unito

  • Kies Quooker als je waarde hecht aan een premium merk, iconisch design en je bijvoorbeeld al tevreden bent met een aparte filter of Cube-module.

  • Kies Unito als je standaard alle functies wilt (kokend, gekoeld, bruisend, gefilterd water), smarthome integratie via app en lager standby-verbruik—én dat alles tegen een scherpe prijs.

Read more

Kokend water kraan energieverbruik

Kokend water kraan energieverbruik

  • Unito scoort beter op standby dankzij extreem laag verbruik van slechts 2,5 W.

  • Quooker is robuust, bekend en populair. Hoewel Quooker aangeeft ca. 511 kWh/jaar te verbruiken, wijzen gebruikerservaringen op veel lagere reële waarden.

  • Voor huishoudens die vaak heet water tappen, kan het verschil in stand-by verbruik mooie energiebesparingen opleveren — vooral bij Unito.

    Tip: Als je puur op zoek bent naar zo zuinig mogelijke prestaties, loont het om te kiezen voor een type met laag standby-verbruik en een efficiënte isolatie.

Read more

Bruisend water kraan vs sodastream

Bruisend water kraan vs sodastream

De keuze tussen een bruisend‑waterkraan en een SodaStream hangt af van jouw situatie. Wil je maximale gemak en een luxe keukenervaring zonder losse apparaten, dan is een bruiswaterkraan ideaal, ondanks de hogere investering en installatie. Drink je liever incidenteel bruiswater, wil je bubbels naar smaak kunnen doseren en houd je van experimenteren met siropen, dan biedt de SodaStream veel vrijheid en een lagere instapprijs.

Ben je klaar om je keuken te upgraden? Bekijk dan ons aanbod aan bruiswaterkranen of SodaStream‑apparaten en kies de oplossing die bij jou past. Heb je vragen? Laat een reactie achter of neem contact op met onze specialisten – we helpen je graag verder!

Read more

Wat kost een Kokend-Water-Kraan?

Wat kost een Kokend-Water-Kraan?

De prijs van een kokend water kraan in 2025 ligt gemiddeld tussen €600 en €1.200, exclusief installatie.

  • Premium merken zoals Quooker en Grohe kosten vaak tussen €1.000 en €2.500.

  • Budgetopties zoals FlexTap zijn er al vanaf €374.

  • UNITO kranen, exclusief bij PureAqua, bieden de beste prijs-kwaliteitverhouding en zijn vaak voordeliger dan Quooker.

  • Installatiekosten liggen gemiddeld tussen €150 – €250.

Read more

Verbeter de levensduur van jouw apparaten met zuiver water

Improve the lifespan of your appliances with pure water

At Pure Aqua, we know how important pure water is for your health and comfort. But did you know it can also improve the lifespan and performance of your appliances? Whether it's your kettle, steamer, coffee maker, or any other...

Read more

De eerste plons in Hallum: Water uit de Hallumervaart drinkbaar?

The first splash in Hallum: Is water from the Hallumervaart drinkable?

It's finally happening: the swimming pool in Hallum is reopening its doors! While families gather for the first dip and childlike excitement fills the air, we're preparing to share something very special. We'll be testing the Hallumervaart water for contaminants...

Read more